Continuous Legal Intelligence · Powered by Mercury

The law changed overnight.
Your analysis didn't.

Totality Law turns legal questions into persistent Legal Awareness Objects — research that never stops watching, never goes stale, and updates the moment something material changes.

Legal Awareness Object · Live
Loading research...
AI Training Data & Copyright
Fair Use · 17 U.S.C. § 107 · Federal · 9th Circuit primary
Position Being Monitored · Current Support: 61%
"Commercial use of publicly accessible copyrighted works for model training is likely to qualify as fair use under current federal law."
61%
↓ 13 points · position weakened
Current support for monitored position
Analysis confidence
High
Evidence quality
Strong
Jurisdiction coverage
94%
Why the position changed — 13 points
New Ninth Circuit authority −8 pts
Related litigation development −4 pts
Legislative movement −1 pt
Net change −13 pts over 90 days
3 material changes since last review
↓ Legal position weakened
New Ninth Circuit authority narrows commercial fair use for AI training
Recent appellate decision tightens the transformativeness analysis for commercial AI applications, cutting against the majority position on training data.
Source: CourtListener · 9th Cir. · Filed Aug 2026 · Illustrative
→ Legislation advancing
Federal AI Copyright Act introduced — training data disclosure requirements
Senate bill would require disclosure of copyrighted works used in training datasets. Committee markup scheduled. If enacted, substantially changes the regulatory landscape.
Source: Congress.gov · S. 2026 · Illustrative
! Related litigation developed
Andersen v. Stability AI — material docket development
Trial date set for November 2026 in N.D. California. Outcome will directly affect the fair use analysis for image-generating AI models and likely influence broader AI training doctrine.
Source: CourtListener · N.D. Cal. · Illustrative
—
Authorities
—
Signals
—
Position Support
—
Days Running
Jurisdiction
Federal · Ninth Circuit · National
Sources monitored
CourtListener · Congress.gov · Federal Register
Authority hierarchy
Binding → Persuasive → Secondary
Last complete search
3 hours ago · Next: tonight 03:00 UTC
Live research · Law current through Aug 23, 2026 · Not legal advice · Attorney review required for consequential decisions
Ask this Legal Awareness Object
Why did confidence fall 13 points?
Show authorities that changed the assessment
How does this differ in the Second Circuit?
Arguments currently favoring fair use
What would change this assessment materially?
Legal Awareness Objects can monitor a question, legal position, regulation, dispute, case, contract obligation, or entire matter.
Totality doesn't just answer the legal question.
It keeps the question alive.
Mercury Legal Signal Feed · Live
What changed in law today
Sources: CourtListener · Federal Register · Updated every 4 hours
⟳ Fetching live legal signals...
Powered by CourtListener (Free Law Project) · Federal Register (GPO) · Signals evaluated against active Legal Awareness Objects
Why a persistent Legal Awareness Object changes everything
A legal answer is a snapshot.
Awareness is continuous.
⚖
For individuals
You asked whether your landlord violated the law. Totality said yes — 91% support. That was Tuesday. On Thursday, a new county ordinance passed that strengthens your position further. You would have missed it. Totality didn't.
Position updated automatically · No action required
⚖
For attorneys
You opened a matter six months ago. Your associate researched the controlling case law. That associate left. A new circuit decision came down last week that changes the enforceability analysis. Totality has been watching the entire time — and flagged the change the morning after it was issued.
Research survives associate turnover · Never starts over
🏢
For legal departments
Your GC commissioned FTO analysis on a key patent before the acquisition. It said LOW risk. Eighteen months later a continuation was filed expanding claim scope directly into your product line. Totality would have flagged it the morning it appeared — before it became a problem.
Continuous monitoring · Delta brief every morning
⬡
For investors
You evaluated a deep tech company's IP position before term sheet. Clean. Six months post-investment, a competitor filed a PTAB petition challenging the portfolio company's core patent. Totality monitors that patent continuously — you'd know the morning the petition was filed, not at the next board meeting.
Portfolio IP monitored overnight · PTAB alerts same day
📋
For regulated businesses
You operate in three states. Employment law changed in two of them last quarter. Your handbook is now non-compliant in California. Your non-compete clause is newly void in Minnesota. Totality monitors all three jurisdictions and flags every change that touches your operating environment.
Multi-jurisdiction monitoring · Policy gap alerts
◎
The common thread
In every case, the legal question didn't end when the research was delivered. The law kept moving. The matter kept developing. The risk kept evolving. A snapshot answer became wrong — and nobody knew until it was too late.
Totality Law keeps the question alive.
So the answer stays true.
Create your first Legal Awareness Object →
Free · No account required · 7-day monitoring included
How It Works
Question → Object → Intelligence →
Continuous awareness.
?
Legal Question
Submit any legal question, matter, regulation, or dispute
→
⬡
Awareness Object
Mercury creates a persistent object with position, jurisdiction, and scope
→
⚖
Authorities
Case law, statutes, regulations, and guidance analyzed and weighted
→
◎
Confidence Score
Structured assessment — authorities weighted against the position being monitored
→
↻
Continuous Watch
Continuously monitors — CourtListener, Federal Register, dockets, legislation, on scheduled and event-driven cycles
→
◈
Delta Brief
Only what changed. Every morning. Nothing stale.
Totality also watches your actual case
Legal Awareness Object · Active Matter
Law current through Aug 23, 2026
Acme Corp. v. Smith
Trade Secrets · Employment · Arizona · Active litigation
2 material developments overnight
! Motion filed
Plaintiff moved for preliminary injunction
Response window open. Outside counsel alert sent. 9 days to respond.
↓ Controlling position weakened
New Arizona appellate authority narrows enforceability
Recent decision tightens trade secret misappropriation standard. Issue 2 position strength: 64% ↓ from 71%.
42
Authorities
186
Documents
7
Open Issues
9d
Next deadline
Illustrative demo · Not legal advice · Attorney review required
Totality watches the law and your matter — simultaneously, overnight, every night.
Legal Domains
Legal intelligence across the areas
that never stop moving.
⬡
IP & Patent
FTO analysis, continuation monitoring, PTAB petitions, Alice/Mayo eligibility
⚖
Litigation
Docket monitoring, case law changes, venue analysis, settlement patterns
📋
Regulatory
Federal Register, agency guidance, enforcement actions, state divergence
👥
Employment
Non-compete enforceability, multi-state compliance, NLRB, pay transparency
🏢
Corporate & M&A
Change of control provisions, fiduciary duties, deal structure risk
📈
Securities
SEC enforcement, disclosure obligations, insider trading, proxy advisors
🔒
Privacy & Data
GDPR, CCPA, state privacy laws, AI regulation, breach notification
🏥
Healthcare
HIPAA, FDA guidance, reimbursement changes, Stark Law compliance
🌿
Environmental
EPA rules, climate disclosure, state environmental law, ESG compliance
⬡
IP & Patent · IP Destiny
Deep tech FTO analysis powered by IP Destiny — TRIZ design-arounds, Alice/Mayo § 101, claim mapping, continuation monitoring, PTAB petitions. The specialized patent intelligence package inside Totality Law.
Visit ipdestiny.com →
Early Access
Ask once.
Keep knowing.
Bring us a legal question, active matter, regulatory issue, or position you need to stay ahead of. We'll turn it into your first Legal Awareness Object.
No commitment. Attorney review available. Not legal advice.
You're on the list. We'll be in touch shortly.